{"id":"W2158394599","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00668.x","title":"The feedback correct‐related positivity: Sensitivity of the event‐related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychophysiology","topic":"Neural dynamics and brain function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":592,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Negativity effect; Psychology; Negative feedback; Fern; Event-related potential; Positive feedback; Cognitive psychology; Electroencephalography; Neuroscience; Social psychology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004958631,0.0003411121,0.0002284973,0.0002175127,0.0001103765,0.000214372,0.0002564515,0.0005547588,0.001658098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006642592,0.0001227646,0.0001266784,0.0001031659,0.000328433,0.0003604919,0.0003855084,0.0003863522,0.0001739169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009945963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002872397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003285627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997169,0.00006198361,0.0000176007,0.00006863113,0.0001108707,0.00002393965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983038,0.001108714,0.0002674237,0.0001020693,0.0001189066,0.0000991147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00118498,0.00009494209,0.006202403,0.0001602149,0.00002181177,0.001236816,0.0001983453,0.0003114891,0.966114,0.0003298516,0.0002084942,0.02393665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002277614,0.001920096,0.6666387,0.0000732855,0.00008701441,0.01527742,0.0003041922,0.01187268,0.2964934,0.005129062,0.001897709,0.0000786384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850365,0.0001883739,0.011018,0.0001237125,0.00005128727,0.00006582238,0.0001200216,0.0001084271,0.003287821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974248,0.00007038187,0.001880367,0.00007242474,0.0000180816,0.00002747277,0.00005114919,0.00002552145,0.0004297552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001658098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005546927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009923315590446345,"score_gpt":0.2390427563790195,"score_spread":0.2291194407885732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}