{"id":"W2158516444","doi":"10.1007/s13280-013-0391-9","title":"Community Management of Natural Resources: A Case Study from Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AMBIO","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"National park; Natural resource; Natural (archaeology); Natural resource management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Natural park; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003052519,0.0001164535,0.000122135,0.00003952714,0.0003438438,0.00003902899,0.000348072,0.00002881865,0.001516396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006833053,0.0001035573,0.00005126674,0.0001983539,0.0001567102,0.0001273534,0.0007884573,0.0001350498,0.0003689717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001066895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000233534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07009233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002759432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988095,0.0001791712,0.0001951545,0.0001965683,0.0004641479,0.0001554487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994481,0.00004744505,0.00009129776,0.0003355547,0.00002307771,0.00005459045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001558611,0.000731713,0.9794096,0.00001587171,0.000164091,0.0001715337,0.007701348,0.00008196365,0.0001564559,0.000004636329,0.006261564,0.005285676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005739715,0.00005945177,0.9580861,0.000009665731,0.00004710314,0.000009304769,0.0358311,0.0002818876,0.00002899397,0.0001303936,0.004816024,0.0001259972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896555,0.00002610836,0.000007134086,0.0002161684,0.00006913573,0.0005250499,0.0000168523,0.00002943639,0.009454618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997363,0.000004885531,0.0003840878,0.0002618701,0.00001358195,0.00001742551,0.00001739939,0.000005080325,0.001932713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06733289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.021543327493902,"score_gpt":0.2240551387629951,"score_spread":0.2025118112690931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}