{"id":"W2158516444","doi":"10.1007/s13280-013-0391-9","title":"Community Management of Natural Resources: A Case Study from Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AMBIO","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"National park; Natural resource; Natural (archaeology); Natural resource management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Natural park; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004460234,0.0003638262,0.000232853,0.0008409754,0.007179471,0.001378254,0.001053556,0.001115773,0.003363378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001032798,0.0001982156,0.0002376985,0.001309378,0.002285295,0.0007868846,0.002245909,0.0006738337,0.000129552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003125264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002133365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1061692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4231116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994417,0.0001896133,0.00001506369,0.00005369682,0.00006314945,0.0002368795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993667,0.0002050446,0.0001029457,0.00002966244,0.00004779518,0.0002479443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003498046,0.001931701,0.3219249,0.0007156658,0.0001728354,0.1434714,0.4313211,0.001706312,0.006925508,0.005246052,0.004381255,0.08185346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145175,0.0006161197,0.3630256,0.0002876553,0.0000794465,0.01305889,0.5957537,0.001343686,0.0007801875,0.0005221958,0.02445031,0.00005082287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970403,0.0001287777,0.00007373178,0.0002312076,0.000003935079,0.00003486598,0.00003206669,0.000003027965,0.002452057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977181,0.0002339871,0.0004103134,0.00009316167,0.000004691475,0.00003017081,0.0000395874,0.000003522375,0.001466468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1061692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2111024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.021543327493902,"score_gpt":0.2240551387629951,"score_spread":0.2025118112690931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}