{"id":"W2158595211","doi":"10.1007/s11156-013-0428-y","title":"Litigation risk, information asymmetry and conditional conservatism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Information asymmetry; Incentive; Audit; Shareholder; Equity (law); Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance; Law; Corporate governance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01173491,0.00036269,0.0009309585,0.002388709,0.0008264742,0.005466168,0.001303461,0.002939557,0.004546368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04650598,0.0004765681,0.0007266742,0.002375061,0.009907512,0.009551957,0.001948119,0.003947958,0.0002816018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002229342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002180449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001209359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001170149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935983,0.002315533,0.0006221868,0.0008795059,0.002000381,0.0005839444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242105,0.05772163,0.009388193,0.00455858,0.003432871,0.0006882268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005872603,0.00003681225,0.003047544,0.0002238551,0.0001211786,0.0001821356,0.0001633974,0.006109282,0.0002718306,0.9559069,0.003269396,0.0306089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009502916,0.00001503182,0.001732274,0.00006193135,0.00002776501,0.0001065383,0.00003756459,0.003151284,0.00006800642,0.9926852,0.002091456,0.00001350809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2898282,0.2240947,0.2039187,0.07450886,0.001367891,0.0000993272,0.000716516,0.000196738,0.2052692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726069,0.01685075,0.00292054,0.001377705,0.001832033,0.00003006932,0.00007407858,0.00001807707,0.004289886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01173491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06206089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01030772685850932,"score_gpt":0.2346676428027321,"score_spread":0.2243599159442228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}