{"id":"W2158654089","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101097","title":"Weighted in‐text citations and research impact patterns: A case study of library and information science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Digital library; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Citation impact; Information science; Data science; Library science; Mathematics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01108745,0.0002913389,0.0006169809,0.01202573,0.002682972,0.004304455,0.0009930014,0.001159903,0.002499494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07674983,0.0001994669,0.0004276323,0.03747851,0.001404953,0.003968659,0.001876009,0.0007947542,0.0003260787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002762154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001660379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01174018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01816602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922019,0.004895794,0.0006747087,0.000279697,0.001693331,0.0002546214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8454418,0.1306999,0.008792796,0.003548845,0.01022179,0.001294885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008186905,0.00186437,0.6959447,0.001543279,0.0005398369,0.004715765,0.061667,0.005488749,0.003402513,0.0277996,0.005799517,0.190416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003004373,0.000906149,0.7572384,0.0005316287,0.0006756294,0.004243217,0.1069226,0.04417841,0.00945687,0.04160676,0.03371852,0.0002213756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904073,0.0004687165,0.00223793,0.0006570562,0.00001302954,0.00007233449,0.0002335547,0.00002970924,0.005880553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950275,0.0003205482,0.003571701,0.00004856461,0.00002338992,0.00004484349,0.0001456206,0.00002709539,0.0007907798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05863672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1729404901123436,"score_gpt":0.5023219081214956,"score_spread":0.329381418009152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}