{"id":"W2158724719","doi":"10.18806/tesl.v28i1.1058","title":"An Introspective Study of Arabic and Mandarin-Speakers’ Reading Comprehension Strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TESL Canada Journal","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; University of Alberta","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Introspection; Semitic languages; Metacognition; Arabic; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883017,0.0003420565,0.0001906448,0.0008687766,0.0008123461,0.0007692259,0.0002515271,0.0002174656,0.002106372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006007717,0.0001296349,0.0001365169,0.0004241881,0.0006321963,0.0004310723,0.0006142962,0.0004956569,0.0003369496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005477087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009197048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02180794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05014122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996185,0.0001091013,0.00002186496,0.00008442005,0.0001194409,0.00004665409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964938,0.001982172,0.0003346864,0.0001764087,0.0007418816,0.0002711583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005188762,0.001701148,0.5193023,0.0002120108,0.00007501652,0.0009992333,0.2861451,0.0001180776,0.07209287,0.0007520659,0.0006391021,0.1174442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001837478,0.001328041,0.9434477,0.00003540726,0.00004086945,0.0009527464,0.0394037,0.0002838824,0.009968542,0.0002837798,0.004201685,0.00003526485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980603,0.00003572942,0.0001050851,0.000009668167,0.000001730501,0.00000977897,0.00001746262,0.000002492096,0.001757605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968412,0.0001020909,0.0006037969,0.00004975981,0.000005231682,0.00002390885,0.00006625527,0.000005776482,0.002301857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02180794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009539989670315212,"score_gpt":0.2893681059512595,"score_spread":0.2798281162809443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}