{"id":"W2158774225","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12289","title":"REVIEW: Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta‐analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":442,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Alberta; Vancouver Island University","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Biodiversity; Forestry; Biodiversity conservation; Meta-analysis; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Business; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008514084,0.002345612,0.01263754,0.006695292,0.0007242271,0.003683473,0.002311999,0.002208665,0.006780304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03212863,0.001033524,0.02115724,0.007703301,0.0008775205,0.002509706,0.001531357,0.001772519,0.0005421111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003092444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005164905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02317504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939734,0.002816577,0.00159864,0.000687324,0.0006701911,0.0002538078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788918,0.01634899,0.002602425,0.0005212994,0.001334824,0.0003006676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005357384,0.00002352848,0.002532549,0.7749823,0.2009585,0.0001696642,0.0001299872,0.0003558484,0.0001671409,0.0002681388,0.001962129,0.01791439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003810083,0.0002869533,0.009797667,0.2009771,0.77735,0.0002261524,0.0001465462,0.0002299537,0.0001485642,0.0005968937,0.009811257,0.00004790612],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00186932,0.9962109,0.0002822351,0.0004161668,0.0001552271,0.0001455772,0.0005872971,0.0000189604,0.0003142326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08357783,0.9115123,0.001251074,0.001590173,0.0002661506,0.0007045853,0.0007348616,0.00002689726,0.0003361823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01263754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04502738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03365640136169146,"score_gpt":0.2143163567216188,"score_spread":0.1806599553599273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}