{"id":"W2158820487","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2009.5090285","title":"A distributed and cooperative supervisory estimation of multi-agent systems - Part II: Verification and case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Supervisor; Supervisory control; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Computer science; Multi-agent system; LTI system theory; State (computer science); Fault (geology); Estimation; Control (management); Invariant (physics); Control engineering; Control theory (sociology); Distributed computing; Linear system; Engineering; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001850464,0.0005213107,0.0005979272,0.0004107665,0.0005469535,0.0009745516,0.001126734,0.001656664,0.001217376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003142855,0.0002414622,0.0006805109,0.0003309557,0.001070421,0.0009318682,0.001188877,0.000873002,0.000114584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008188328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007881111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004269144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002575976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989296,0.0004800864,0.00004723201,0.0001717074,0.000268754,0.0001025509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977701,0.001439865,0.0001906773,0.000331463,0.0001989589,0.00006898298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003266647,0.0003518357,0.004029041,0.0002954981,0.00005703705,0.002568483,0.00037547,0.8786902,0.008031693,0.05242317,0.001046737,0.05180407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000551737,0.0001445618,0.0004644246,0.00001480567,0.0000112313,0.0001933567,0.00009703531,0.9888597,0.003834678,0.005146292,0.001166982,0.00001182699],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1470338,0.0008557991,0.8439676,0.0004094526,0.00003318269,0.0003075579,0.00009520524,0.0002160989,0.007081429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9371759,0.0001907915,0.06090998,0.00002374446,0.00001315328,0.0001464569,0.0000443079,0.000009059035,0.001486701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004269144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009786367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02580236315046349,"score_gpt":0.2455966138347672,"score_spread":0.2197942506843037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}