{"id":"W2158857852","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2013.772879","title":"Evaluating research – peer review team assessment and journal based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Economic Papers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Tertiary Education Commission; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Weighting; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2006008,0.0003234191,0.0008220938,0.1283028,0.0008377927,0.007981418,0.002771988,0.0002524529,0.003588049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03334043,0.0002288852,0.0002406046,0.1043145,0.0004435701,0.001247763,0.0007247456,0.00219706,0.0008518017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006920415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00393273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01503371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001928628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9750046,0.003376553,0.001858257,0.001561272,0.0159555,0.002243818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747168,0.01426902,0.0004929412,0.00152903,0.006181823,0.002810409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000198666,0.00003770927,0.282914,0.00001352224,0.00001483833,0.00000546609,0.00008242881,0.0001061896,0.0001692818,0.0000127629,0.5623164,0.1543075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002738859,0.0006330152,0.6663533,0.00042057,0.00001091553,0.00003542771,0.0004689883,0.006019663,0.0000201116,0.01073888,0.312197,0.0003632445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8533228,0.01997423,0.00004460542,0.0876343,0.001017894,0.002801321,0.00004386024,0.00004202137,0.03511899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7951254,0.0645181,0.003657051,0.001251809,0.001354967,0.0001843533,0.00002861982,0.0001019008,0.1337778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3834392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7149813458606749,"score_gpt":0.6179681557462509,"score_spread":0.097013190114424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}