{"id":"W2159112315","doi":"10.1093/aob/mct304","title":"Can the biomass-ratio hypothesis predict mixed-species litter decomposition along a climatic gradient?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Botany","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Species richness; Abiotic component; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Ecosystem; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Litter; Plant litter; Environmental gradient; Decomposition; Atmospheric sciences; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004466412,0.0006697857,0.0005633107,0.0007288363,0.0001777512,0.0009332689,0.000560261,0.000752915,0.001005334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00849042,0.0002369005,0.0005632846,0.00032902,0.0006204823,0.0008480189,0.0004221967,0.0003792634,0.000477725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002241179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002127287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003054129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002101922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990681,0.0004864851,0.00004810846,0.0002432102,0.00008170206,0.00007240188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921181,0.005901358,0.000982951,0.0003129031,0.0003806351,0.0003041552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002356931,0.00006198341,0.9759725,0.00004040279,0.0002660874,0.00005158053,0.00006496295,0.01226698,0.001990829,0.0001156438,0.0001339526,0.008799413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002212282,0.00023763,0.8752767,0.00001884568,0.00004863709,0.000143628,0.0001883796,0.1217823,0.0007968556,0.00129117,0.0001712192,0.00002259662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917033,0.0002684446,0.007376082,0.00007825858,0.0000120271,0.00001090247,0.0001607938,0.00005085292,0.0003392673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986901,0.00003075106,0.001083663,0.00001501366,0.0000085412,0.000005244836,0.0001310353,0.000007029043,0.00002853765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004466412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02362096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0285723182974241,"score_gpt":0.2244928042041804,"score_spread":0.1959204859067563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}