{"id":"W2159112315","doi":"10.1093/aob/mct304","title":"Can the biomass-ratio hypothesis predict mixed-species litter decomposition along a climatic gradient?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Botany","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Species richness; Abiotic component; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Ecosystem; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Litter; Plant litter; Environmental gradient; Decomposition; Atmospheric sciences; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003396608,0.0001069071,0.0001491947,0.00002930141,0.0002136075,0.0000321192,0.0002839418,0.00005303462,0.001317859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004128792,0.000079153,0.00008658683,0.0001236898,0.000350753,0.0001634776,0.0001420005,0.00005783206,0.0004980012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002515848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003670346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004877427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003477711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990196,0.0001305886,0.000202158,0.0001869276,0.0001873794,0.0002733776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994445,0.0001259934,0.000102333,0.0002488657,0.00001273655,0.00006554846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001395449,0.000496116,0.5371478,0.00008515715,0.0002288567,0.00002226694,0.004231367,0.0004222493,0.124373,0.001817696,0.3247839,0.006252022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002723971,0.0003291896,0.9262562,0.00002083738,0.00004336411,0.00001127689,0.0002497119,0.005000137,0.04991303,0.006184991,0.01151327,0.0002055405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883902,0.00002416019,0.0001054221,0.007672162,0.0001255547,0.00012551,0.00002660441,0.00002110191,0.003509296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972112,0.00002461123,0.0001600737,0.002135544,0.00003271718,0.000007112116,0.000005243628,0.000006674175,0.0004167904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3891084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0285723182974241,"score_gpt":0.2244928042041804,"score_spread":0.1959204859067563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}