{"id":"W2159121089","doi":"10.1017/s0266462313000664","title":"RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Health technology; Agency (philosophy); Health care; Relevance (law); Management science; Procurement; Systematic review; Evidence-based medicine; Quality (philosophy); Evidence-based practice; Clinical decision support system; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Economics; Marketing; Sociology; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03051083,0.0002704722,0.001763164,0.004573772,0.0001318568,0.00005074546,0.001588939,0.0002786617,0.00009607904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006040882,0.0003247288,0.0001298811,0.0009851101,0.00008512319,0.000650392,0.0002003972,0.001112592,0.00003695539],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005915626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001386541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005185356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002309831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989378,0.0009600097,0.007936981,0.0006875435,0.0003901396,0.0006472823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921588,0.0007119075,0.005783051,0.0006434409,0.0004488057,0.0002539862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006066876,0.001169886,0.3549841,0.006218083,0.0002062144,0.00002158447,0.002205371,0.003793306,0.000008218284,0.4979335,0.01037352,0.1230255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005672085,0.005567959,0.2517366,0.05889245,0.00003365564,0.0007403453,0.06989568,0.02220992,0.0000398338,0.04591041,0.5368294,0.002471625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03678602,0.05808352,0.02585115,0.874877,0.001675106,0.001591823,0.00007144741,0.0000979504,0.0009659911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733986,0.0167833,0.08241297,0.02681467,0.0002275538,0.0002904244,0.00001809641,0.00004081097,0.00001354464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8480623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2594598380726667,"score_gpt":0.5170986881121816,"score_spread":0.2576388500395149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}