{"id":"W2159121089","doi":"10.1017/s0266462313000664","title":"RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Health technology; Agency (philosophy); Health care; Relevance (law); Management science; Procurement; Systematic review; Evidence-based medicine; Quality (philosophy); Evidence-based practice; Clinical decision support system; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Economics; Marketing; Sociology; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7041502,0.006078764,0.01906788,0.05299515,0.006246295,0.04853535,0.01460805,0.02063929,0.01210559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8245094,0.005056384,0.01374293,0.04551925,0.03245442,0.02818365,0.02457339,0.02140794,0.00492021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03118165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1090174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007654747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008540054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1338836,0.7675267,0.0503556,0.01264257,0.03393579,0.001655729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03869096,0.8883845,0.01617654,0.02664933,0.02820169,0.00189704],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004785093,0.0001343488,0.000838907,0.2471595,0.006891121,0.0004724539,0.01533361,0.003509928,0.0006577429,0.2999919,0.02972329,0.3948086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007195678,0.0003385118,0.0007653767,0.2066554,0.003432646,0.0006115944,0.003562735,0.006053352,0.001082811,0.601796,0.1743844,0.0005976552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000987262,0.376224,0.4685724,0.1145541,0.01433165,0.01227427,0.001389783,0.001237449,0.01042895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02155904,0.1512024,0.7799152,0.01604031,0.006063518,0.02326029,0.0004415226,0.0004490332,0.001068668],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2958498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3648355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2594598380726667,"score_gpt":0.5170986881121816,"score_spread":0.2576388500395149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}