{"id":"W2159530637","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2003.820709","title":"Coordination in Markets With Nonconvexities as a Mathematical Program With Equilibrium Constraints—Part II: Case Studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Lagrange multiplier; Economic dispatch; Multiplier (economics); Electric power system; Power system simulation; Electricity market; Computer science; Market clearing; Marginal cost; Electricity; Mathematics; Economics; Power (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002920283,0.0003551051,0.0004769833,0.0003622985,0.0001256375,0.00009275172,0.0001006955,0.0001405315,0.00003419098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007518835,0.0002903308,0.00005218881,0.0006628155,0.0001764479,0.0003606703,0.000001196525,0.0002835529,0.00004139073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004976248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005222141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001349484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982697,0.00007935085,0.0005278363,0.0003232984,0.000374694,0.0004250626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999207,0.0001150373,0.00008372466,0.0003199344,0.0001636653,0.0001106987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002895308,0.00091333,0.00003804569,0.001194816,0.0009668647,0.002981932,0.008588358,0.9821776,0.0001967171,0.001556882,0.0002481827,0.0008477299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04379834,0.02498758,0.00009617905,0.02685773,0.001586888,0.1984525,0.07402062,0.5747067,0.04161861,0.000618693,0.003931529,0.009324623],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3360479,0.0003272618,0.6514772,0.0001392908,0.001120626,0.002624423,0.00002876947,0.001140447,0.007094031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973025,0.00001028976,0.001055131,0.00001100985,0.00001302199,0.0009294305,0.000002753603,0.00007934695,0.0005965503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6612545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01130599141994049,"score_gpt":0.2403228832594716,"score_spread":0.2290168918395311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}