{"id":"W2159530637","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2003.820709","title":"Coordination in Markets With Nonconvexities as a Mathematical Program With Equilibrium Constraints—Part II: Case Studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Lagrange multiplier; Economic dispatch; Multiplier (economics); Electric power system; Power system simulation; Electricity market; Computer science; Market clearing; Marginal cost; Electricity; Mathematics; Economics; Power (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00204335,0.000574098,0.0009374369,0.0006042882,0.0008720763,0.001631623,0.001285095,0.002230136,0.004840859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005360155,0.0004448243,0.0008582269,0.001448107,0.001771654,0.001447635,0.00131039,0.001412114,0.0001955212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001503189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009045187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006232175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006737238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992036,0.0005147262,0.00002466044,0.00006147296,0.00009644169,0.00009907565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995516,0.003831195,0.0002728628,0.0001350161,0.0001298889,0.0001151598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006633348,0.0001443291,0.0006902243,0.00007490021,0.00002093773,0.0005352292,0.00008668786,0.9302639,0.0002347382,0.06376561,0.0007454476,0.003371619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007810883,0.0000633127,0.0002078374,0.00001046031,0.00000886206,0.0000663826,0.0001456351,0.9850315,0.0003279889,0.01293355,0.001116933,0.000009440112],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5860129,0.0006801022,0.3722381,0.001563798,0.00006133172,0.0003801998,0.0004046216,0.00013006,0.03852887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292472,0.0002919821,0.06530838,0.00005640211,0.00002615458,0.0002592778,0.00008539164,0.00002700866,0.004698281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006232175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01619428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01130599141994049,"score_gpt":0.2403228832594716,"score_spread":0.2290168918395311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}