{"id":"W2159628446","doi":"10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.063","title":"Cue repetition increases inhibition of return","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuroscience Letters","topic":"Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Inhibition of return; Repetition (rhetorical device); Neuroscience; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003501434,0.00129783,0.001968419,0.0004712036,0.0003364646,0.0008679566,0.0008923554,0.001132061,0.009893718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002752229,0.0008838779,0.0006330623,0.0002852994,0.0008724141,0.0007702095,0.001293465,0.002061972,0.001474689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006511274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008444536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001959813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002373733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994228,0.00006932364,0.00004465425,0.0001296125,0.0001633824,0.0001703222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980744,0.0005673998,0.0003953051,0.0002804852,0.00007258464,0.0006098389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01114288,0.0005458617,0.0005742139,0.0001605861,0.00006378286,0.0001201204,0.00006409586,0.0001703769,0.9765311,0.0002279134,0.0004934477,0.009905573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003037046,0.01234415,0.1906407,0.0001377166,0.0005574838,0.001158332,0.000253054,0.01114332,0.7731429,0.002131138,0.00529896,0.0001552272],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948969,0.0007398449,0.0007744345,0.0001555045,0.0002577986,0.00002686919,0.0001307989,0.000219234,0.002798526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901897,0.0008499531,0.001227522,0.0003337231,0.0001769576,0.00007856221,0.000340909,0.0005365518,0.006266169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009893718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0330978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04456771832536282,"score_gpt":0.2776113812190572,"score_spread":0.2330436628936943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}