{"id":"W2159674261","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.004","title":"Ammonia emissions from livestock industries in Canada: Feasibility of abatement strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Odor and Emission Control Technologies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Industry Canada","keywords":"Livestock; Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Agriculture; Animal husbandry; Ammonia; Dairy cattle; Environmental protection; Environmental engineering; Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Animal science; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005156035,0.0001171947,0.0001536805,0.00003372725,0.00003406292,0.000005761744,0.0001369603,0.0001271916,0.0004776198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000670154,0.0001074299,0.00002684454,0.00005498613,0.00008010348,0.0001109975,0.00007290518,0.0003594034,0.000006469646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003964901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001387405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3740202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.245381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992026,0.00001132769,0.0002566506,0.0001791847,0.0001749026,0.0001753427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996033,0.00004040232,0.00006387397,0.0002281093,0.000001533355,0.00006272496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001859299,0.00006519544,0.04384109,0.00000417511,0.000007916482,0.000002839201,0.00005354579,0.0005461039,0.9482698,0.0001116037,0.0001007756,0.006978303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006405361,0.00002647512,0.6372853,0.0000246959,0.00001057867,0.00000113642,0.002806326,0.002201379,0.3552899,0.0007011632,0.0008215251,0.0001910304],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989064,0.00008246155,0.0001261597,0.0002045986,0.0001199031,0.0001146804,0.0001121614,0.00003876658,0.0002948935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995102,0.00001988069,0.0003377952,0.00001103515,0.0000235282,0.000009463316,0.00002512158,0.000007895304,0.00005509585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5934442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01398460311708693,"score_gpt":0.2197026499564508,"score_spread":0.2057180468393638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}