{"id":"W2159729171","doi":"10.1586/14737167.5.6.661","title":"Ethical economics and cost–effectiveness analysis: is it ethical to ignore opportunity costs?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Health economics; Ethical issues; Opportunity cost; Public economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Actuarial science; Cost effectiveness; Medicine; Positive economics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Microeconomics; Political science; Operations management; Health care; Law; Economic growth; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05183398,0.002945353,0.007422623,0.005798525,0.00263124,0.0101298,0.005709255,0.03049464,0.006369782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1835386,0.001916529,0.00318714,0.004163873,0.009503772,0.006406965,0.001546904,0.04055209,0.004623098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004483027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006806864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003728933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00911713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9704863,0.01287651,0.004689273,0.001307317,0.01006833,0.0005722323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6542028,0.2814061,0.006942301,0.004274852,0.04904808,0.004125798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002793216,0.00001171812,0.00002439176,0.0007025662,0.00008942828,0.00007047236,0.00003706199,0.00004627172,0.00001990101,0.002076747,0.9853601,0.01153323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002669955,0.00003840977,0.0004285937,0.005263692,0.0004318448,0.0004878004,0.0001788347,0.0005644847,0.0001588063,0.02168997,0.9703963,0.00009427205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004604277,0.07277023,0.001163148,0.1613196,0.7630948,0.00002933038,0.00007526738,0.00004982296,0.001451754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001207938,0.03206614,0.001058005,0.06245989,0.8999476,0.00006353383,0.00003232959,0.00006799991,0.003096594],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05183398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2741276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3772434423151699,"score_gpt":0.6545457216448355,"score_spread":0.2773022793296656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}