{"id":"W2159741342","doi":"10.5897/jmer12.025","title":"Finite element modeling and analysis of zigzag and armchair type single wall carbon nanotube","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanical Engineering Research","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zigzag; Carbon nanotube; Materials science; Finite element method; Modulus; Composite material; Stiffness; Carbon fibers; Work (physics); Space frame; Carbon nanotube metal matrix composites; Structural engineering; Nanotube; Composite number; Mechanical engineering; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002720962,0.0003783942,0.0004486317,0.0005732136,0.0003639001,0.0005118672,0.0006875969,0.001269592,0.001717598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005272072,0.000414833,0.000602146,0.000378546,0.0004052934,0.0004590772,0.0002656712,0.0003109385,0.0004660462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004653996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007036405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005769402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005302848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998341,0.00002880461,0.000008882251,0.00002194288,0.00008731025,0.00001889852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997863,0.00009047789,0.00003076407,0.00002148047,0.0000584386,0.0000125959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003267881,0.00003132481,0.0009394688,0.00005123302,0.00001264877,0.0001100772,0.00007271535,0.9724621,0.01816007,0.002211029,0.0001897788,0.005726858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000165664,0.00001271018,0.0002355928,0.000004309033,0.000002550112,0.0000152601,0.00001160856,0.9974117,0.001697444,0.0001704773,0.0004325329,0.000004244089],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3929259,0.0005306937,0.5821024,0.0003407776,0.00008177796,0.0001338803,0.0006276167,0.0007189069,0.02253805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130228,0.0003528807,0.07530423,0.0000368364,0.00001085246,0.0002148791,0.0003982414,0.0000940245,0.01056517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005769402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01147163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05211712893551716,"score_gpt":0.3088868016502265,"score_spread":0.2567696727147094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}