{"id":"W2159741342","doi":"10.5897/jmer12.025","title":"Finite element modeling and analysis of zigzag and armchair type single wall carbon nanotube","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanical Engineering Research","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zigzag; Carbon nanotube; Materials science; Finite element method; Modulus; Composite material; Stiffness; Carbon fibers; Work (physics); Space frame; Carbon nanotube metal matrix composites; Structural engineering; Nanotube; Composite number; Mechanical engineering; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001965187,0.0001277382,0.0003149479,0.0004289623,0.00004983438,0.00004822264,0.000177179,0.00008993271,0.00004466089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005706212,0.0001198986,0.00004479514,0.0008243531,0.00004486091,0.00008564495,0.0004003128,0.0002075588,0.000002491678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007913714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000179743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001182424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008277505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982451,0.00008102399,0.0002895769,0.0002820374,0.0005588107,0.0005434275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998745,0.0005745722,0.00002663384,0.0003055141,0.0001524956,0.0001957622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002710242,0.00006164873,0.0003005625,0.0000581792,0.00006209561,0.000001563406,0.0002006755,0.04031713,0.9571416,0.001628285,0.000001825746,0.0001993305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001133715,0.0001075798,0.00007314912,0.00002811911,0.00006505267,0.000001614673,0.00001937189,0.7518286,0.247544,0.00005459712,0.00006346926,0.0001010695],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906219,0.001128046,0.00778225,0.00006480367,0.0001528898,0.0001295411,0.00000525073,0.00004992931,0.00006537766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962854,0.00006237213,0.003526083,0.00000853749,0.00005509851,0.00001142245,0.000003705867,0.00002070917,0.0000266313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7115115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4889323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05211712893551716,"score_gpt":0.3088868016502265,"score_spread":0.2567696727147094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}