{"id":"W2159772705","doi":"10.1016/j.canlet.2004.04.023","title":"Structure–activity relationships of quassinoids for eukaryotic protein synthesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer Letters","topic":"Phytochemical compounds biological activities","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"In vitro; Chemistry; In vivo; Biochemistry; Moiety; Protein biosynthesis; Structure–activity relationship; Stereochemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006217926,0.0001191766,0.0001567115,0.00002131235,0.00006243785,0.000008044781,0.0001385431,0.0001109677,0.000008398438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000207693,0.0001031789,0.00009018178,0.00005763498,0.0001587517,0.000005384303,0.00003580435,0.0001008972,5.699814e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005779017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000592114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002671158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001982328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993438,0.00004244578,0.0001237532,0.0002444445,0.00007205308,0.0001735428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995925,0.00004463785,0.00009421496,0.0001899816,0.0000366599,0.00004196495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001296498,0.00002909645,0.001674891,0.00004678337,0.00003667955,2.385118e-7,0.00001092221,0.0001766849,0.9971138,0.0000614652,0.0001903112,0.0005294745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002743835,0.00007447575,0.007129232,0.00003059485,0.00001648437,0.000001019215,0.000005488918,0.000005159778,0.990833,0.001122006,0.0003711332,0.0001370243],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919019,0.0001394288,0.005868386,0.001550948,0.00005867468,0.0003015244,0.0001167077,0.0000117666,0.00005064456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976854,0.000004606651,0.001619843,0.0002803855,0.0001618518,0.0001965959,0.00001845349,0.00001294751,0.00001989457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006280806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4207512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02587721415094733,"score_gpt":0.2573467632185794,"score_spread":0.231469549067632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}