{"id":"W2159818988","doi":"10.1139/w03-102","title":"Wastewater-grown duckweed may be safely used as fish feed","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wastewater; Fecal coliform; Contamination; Biology; Fish farming; Sewage treatment; Commercial fish feed; Aquatic plant; Lemna minor; Stabilization pond; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Aquaculture; Water quality; Fishery; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Macrophyte","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001376991,0.0002687092,0.0003020272,0.0002244953,0.0002298422,0.0004768269,0.0002138841,0.0002303162,0.0009255096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002158597,0.00007835222,0.0001889651,0.0002265909,0.0001703436,0.0002162917,0.0002472209,0.0001520332,0.0002200402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005168053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004114949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004648809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01564789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998395,0.00003286268,0.00001564467,0.0000283729,0.00004450877,0.00003907996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998595,0.00001493331,0.00004525997,0.00001349084,0.00003912362,0.00002771755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002964045,0.0001346628,0.006926292,0.0001487503,0.00002030218,0.0002526663,0.00006173499,0.0001477113,0.9752049,0.00007046001,0.00007854889,0.01665751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004452433,0.004587143,0.1113174,0.00006497594,0.0001234148,0.0009169374,0.0007641214,0.0008315174,0.8725327,0.0001919426,0.008599807,0.00002551271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973744,0.0003577086,0.001116241,0.0000511451,0.000009641135,0.00001724624,0.00008224529,0.00003545668,0.0009559678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943275,0.0004892785,0.002999343,0.00003652474,0.000002504974,0.00001106546,0.0001984853,0.000007310069,0.001928062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004648809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009243488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008861306970013718,"score_gpt":0.1943339163805981,"score_spread":0.1854726094105844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}