{"id":"W2159861263","doi":"10.3758/s13423-011-0057-1","title":"Magnitude comparison revisited: An alternative approach to binary choice under uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Probabilistic logic; Task (project management); Magnitude (astronomy); Cognitive psychology; Focus (optics); Binary number; Process (computing); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02620954,0.001139196,0.003010931,0.002871489,0.0009147035,0.006324213,0.00372639,0.004088474,0.01350559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1219092,0.0005362575,0.002398117,0.003775954,0.004733944,0.01255949,0.003155342,0.006994526,0.0005607279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001548229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001569799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005807345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006614333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9799227,0.01303,0.0008232152,0.002282984,0.003434237,0.0005067809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153022,0.0746399,0.002789698,0.00381871,0.00247445,0.0009751021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006498165,0.0001063281,0.00128148,0.0004723162,0.0002195266,0.0001298331,0.0004124594,0.002488496,0.001001333,0.9059924,0.002196991,0.08504909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008923007,0.0001033356,0.0006183219,0.00007905248,0.00006483849,0.0001047052,0.00006816597,0.01273297,0.0002674135,0.9825603,0.003274449,0.00003717088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03894285,0.005586969,0.9121917,0.01535308,0.002899689,0.0002304608,0.0002983511,0.0001628437,0.02433399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7014667,0.002946608,0.2791054,0.004730639,0.00338753,0.000768694,0.0001765656,0.0001715839,0.007246376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02620954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1386109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3361898231911778,"score_gpt":0.4517143702888713,"score_spread":0.1155245470976936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}