{"id":"W2159861263","doi":"10.3758/s13423-011-0057-1","title":"Magnitude comparison revisited: An alternative approach to binary choice under uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Probabilistic logic; Task (project management); Magnitude (astronomy); Cognitive psychology; Focus (optics); Binary number; Process (computing); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004493462,0.0004640668,0.001295473,0.0003097825,0.0001988554,0.0002776177,0.002621896,0.0001311939,0.006170737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007687864,0.0003586342,0.0003674582,0.0006643281,0.0001272201,0.0002176066,0.0003322039,0.00040524,0.01481659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001600631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005847636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003492571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002118875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946238,0.0006325823,0.001948942,0.001628466,0.0006350847,0.0005311253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956207,0.0005901549,0.000795586,0.002134507,0.0003262401,0.0005327989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001093595,0.001082304,0.00190443,0.00009924795,0.0000384423,0.000004661185,0.000500779,0.0006878813,0.00001580567,0.0007475363,0.3331441,0.6616654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004152666,0.0002805719,0.006307866,0.0009184847,0.00009007151,0.00002240282,0.0003314789,0.0005522138,0.000005600193,0.005228461,0.985221,0.0006265456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7727279,0.04920695,0.008238481,0.007421082,0.003746319,0.004481976,0.0001589115,0.0003828439,0.1536355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675097,0.01451075,0.07467411,0.0375357,0.00100195,0.0004706448,0.0000998082,0.0002044496,0.003992865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6610389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3361898231911778,"score_gpt":0.4517143702888713,"score_spread":0.1155245470976936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}