{"id":"W2159946869","doi":"10.1038/nature08696","title":"The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Strategic Research Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Shenzhen Government","keywords":"Contig; Genome; Sequence assembly; Biology; DNA sequencing; Genetics; Hybrid genome assembly; Whole genome sequencing; Genome size; Reference genome; Computational biology; Gene; Evolutionary biology; Transcriptome","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006415749380643055,"score_gpt":0.2412707267869758,"score_spread":0.2348549774063328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["bench_or_experimental","not_applicable"],"consensus_intersection":["bench_or_experimental"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.000030518043793392844,"metaepi_narrow":0.000015259021896696422,"metaepi_broad":0,"bibliometrics":0.000015259021896696422,"sts":0.00006103608758678569,"scholarly_communication":0.00018310826276035706,"open_science":0.0013885709925993744,"research_integrity":0.00012207217517357137,"randomized_trial":0.000030518043793392844,"nonrandomized_trial":0,"observational":0.0005951018539711605,"systematic_review":0,"meta_analysis":0.000030518043793392844,"case_report":0.0004119935912108034,"qualitative":0.00009155413138017853,"simulation_or_modeling":0.000015259021896696422,"bench_or_experimental":0.9913481345845732,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.0016937514305333029,"not_applicable":0.03341725795376516,"design_other":0.021011673151750974},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.000015259021896696422,"metaepi_narrow":0.000015259021896696422,"metaepi_broad":0,"bibliometrics":0,"sts":0.0002136263065537499,"scholarly_communication":0.000045777065690089265,"open_science":0.0009918364232852674,"research_integrity":0.00016784924086366064,"randomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0.00006103608758678569,"observational":0.036362249179827576,"systematic_review":0,"meta_analysis":0,"case_report":0.00019836728465705348,"qualitative":0.000045777065690089265,"simulation_or_modeling":0.0003509575036240177,"bench_or_experimental":0.8438849469748989,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.002059967956054017,"not_applicable":0.03360036621652552}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}