{"id":"W2159968952","doi":"10.1002/sim.3243","title":"Discussion of ‘A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Matching (statistics); Library science; Citation; Propensity score matching; Psychology; Operations research; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Mathematics; Pathology; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001208247,0.0001325573,0.0005084225,0.0001276108,0.00002988845,0.000002105093,0.0002034305,0.000125124,0.00003346062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01982,0.000065245,0.000009561496,0.0003877851,0.0009385181,0.00006294296,0.00008054409,0.0005781499,1.888557e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000149389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006131436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005978317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981646,0.0002066867,0.0006224179,0.0001638042,0.0006658316,0.0001766644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955741,0.003855548,0.0001227556,0.0002293038,0.0001539192,0.00006439177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000951887,0.0004456291,0.1167272,0.002542559,0.00002018771,0.001242579,0.04357575,9.655671e-7,0.000951992,0.8168668,0.006728148,0.01080301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008417381,0.0004964801,0.09199639,0.003673756,0.00004074856,0.0001504713,0.001344246,0.0001515259,0.0004054716,0.9006615,0.00007107785,0.0001666156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5304736,0.0005043293,0.4640504,0.003203828,0.0001671502,0.000641431,0.0001989313,0.00004211831,0.0007182053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902272,0.0001914082,0.1093771,0.00005758756,0.00008022059,0.00001020266,0.00003214206,0.00001279582,0.00001134981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3597536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1289485109003761,"score_gpt":0.4533669741319672,"score_spread":0.3244184632315911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}