{"id":"W2160028617","doi":"10.1109/time.2006.10","title":"Conditional and Composite Temporal Constraints with Preferences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Local consistency; Set (abstract data type); Constraint programming; Budget constraint; Preference; Projection (relational algebra); Mathematical optimization; Theoretical computer science; Semiring; Artificial intelligence; Constraint satisfaction problem; Mathematics; Algorithm; Stochastic programming","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004880218,0.0009410985,0.0005869606,0.000920761,0.0008579882,0.002499893,0.001404786,0.001032085,0.007400856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146219,0.0004448517,0.001434861,0.002305841,0.001799043,0.005673552,0.002250009,0.002257768,0.0006831426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009019166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00188873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002518147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005096014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994078,0.002064939,0.0005405488,0.0008511471,0.002115859,0.0003495032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98963,0.006648276,0.0009043659,0.001499865,0.0009674323,0.000350096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002207475,0.0001107953,0.001630971,0.0004495496,0.0001048492,0.0007975764,0.0005841056,0.1360981,0.00516971,0.746829,0.004360537,0.1036441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006103503,0.0001108075,0.0008540488,0.0000987833,0.0000818171,0.0006690999,0.0003014275,0.411074,0.007488521,0.5505649,0.02863349,0.00006198532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0242944,0.0002698384,0.9614454,0.0005850171,0.00007861259,0.000170557,0.0005903835,0.0002380188,0.01232784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3450958,0.000426998,0.6455579,0.0003254767,0.0001277584,0.0003586697,0.0007273286,0.0001029925,0.007277002],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007400856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02580935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007154168888011379,"score_gpt":0.1989811948992757,"score_spread":0.1918270260112643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}