{"id":"W2160129052","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20189","title":"Optimization of acrylonitrile removal by activated carbon‐granular using response surface methodology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Response surface methodology; Acrylonitrile; Box–Behnken design; Activated carbon; Statistical analysis; Materials science; Chromatography; Chemistry; Statistics; Chemical engineering; Mathematics; Composite material; Adsorption; Engineering; Organic chemistry; Polymer","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009003287,0.0000822252,0.0001594338,0.00005347774,0.00003085359,0.00001344965,0.0002338227,0.00006646702,0.00002718853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002738843,0.00006699828,0.00004878024,0.0002221771,0.00005716636,0.00006182621,0.0000132837,0.0001890329,2.172463e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002159159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003352611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00140858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007088223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993004,0.00008172102,0.0002334886,0.00007013143,0.000135922,0.0001783745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.0001096386,0.000122832,0.0001161633,0.00001570308,0.0001328955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002747819,0.000002293453,0.00003832549,0.000001250504,0.000005121649,0.00000785151,0.00004542548,0.4168978,0.5826762,0.000003142625,0.00006595148,0.0002290983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511291,0.00004855765,0.0000851494,0.00003902649,0.00002610579,0.00008363594,0.000009459834,0.1123001,0.8867119,0.00007926793,0.0003692044,0.00009644705],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869804,0.00009041389,0.01232769,0.0003996259,0.00004347271,0.00005077768,0.000001287033,0.00001106922,0.00009526038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579441,0.000002779743,0.04197266,0.00003794799,0.00001725812,1.110779e-7,5.936495e-7,0.000008706013,0.00001583096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3045977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2732111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0184972518445081,"score_gpt":0.2359334831108348,"score_spread":0.2174362312663267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}