{"id":"W2160129052","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20189","title":"Optimization of acrylonitrile removal by activated carbon‐granular using response surface methodology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Response surface methodology; Acrylonitrile; Box–Behnken design; Activated carbon; Statistical analysis; Materials science; Chromatography; Chemistry; Statistics; Chemical engineering; Mathematics; Composite material; Adsorption; Engineering; Organic chemistry; Polymer","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008568929,0.0008776116,0.001552427,0.0004229286,0.0002878272,0.001023755,0.0003550776,0.0004581827,0.0004399171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007550371,0.0003287882,0.000736921,0.0006806059,0.0003724679,0.0002215807,0.0002666004,0.0003951222,0.0001850512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004888352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006506196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002244819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003218532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991174,0.0002449319,0.00008437097,0.0001171801,0.0003288927,0.0001073044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997073,0.0001218546,0.00006319208,0.00002403534,0.00005714141,0.00002650431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004983349,0.0002365792,0.0002568535,0.0001703644,0.00002245491,0.00003881682,0.00001856907,0.00479767,0.9898829,0.00003355848,0.00001639962,0.004027602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005741166,0.001631896,0.002537652,0.000006436927,0.00003824656,0.00003444303,0.00002969674,0.0113414,0.9839516,0.00002935656,0.00032121,0.00002081142],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937263,0.0004289588,0.005166475,0.00002961804,0.0000107834,0.0001060865,0.0000817448,0.00005149506,0.0003986042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900368,0.0003743105,0.008851903,0.00001367169,0.000003819457,0.0000858577,0.0001292561,0.0000147328,0.0004896094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002244819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004531741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0184972518445081,"score_gpt":0.2359334831108348,"score_spread":0.2174362312663267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}