{"id":"W2160189668","doi":"10.1139/f02-150","title":"The potential use of environmental information to manage squid stocks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Cephalopods and Marine Biology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Stock (firearms); Squid; Stock assessment; Loligo; Abundance (ecology); Fisheries management; Environmental science; Biology; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00165387,0.0004263186,0.0002823586,0.0007783003,0.0003645306,0.000934837,0.000623331,0.0005632983,0.001290397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006911002,0.0001958843,0.0003118698,0.0006203945,0.0003297702,0.002052196,0.000655508,0.0003007155,0.0001964533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005924663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009254338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01146067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02170038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996456,0.0002010851,0.00001553821,0.0000450027,0.00006373888,0.0000290507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971681,0.001420233,0.0005402754,0.0003374961,0.0003858049,0.0001479969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003845232,0.0003281652,0.2276261,0.0001525486,0.0003053162,0.0002258417,0.0002578239,0.4895773,0.005261222,0.01174766,0.002186987,0.2619465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006032343,0.0003899763,0.06892066,0.00009749502,0.00014332,0.0001501243,0.0002798899,0.8932871,0.003004245,0.02757013,0.00597638,0.0001203462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7952282,0.001417662,0.1700335,0.005662389,0.0001178254,0.0001490234,0.001861558,0.001431473,0.02409833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651528,0.0002958726,0.03359649,0.00008998751,0.00002461051,0.0000235421,0.0003135031,0.00002137713,0.0004818359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01146067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02278793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01612870590477979,"score_gpt":0.1678857980213087,"score_spread":0.1517570921165289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}