{"id":"W2160207060","doi":"10.1177/0165025409340805","title":"The discordant MZ-twin method: One step closer to the holy grail of causality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Behavioral Development","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Twin study; Holy Grail; Psychology; Causality (physics); Developmental psychology; Monozygotic twin; Population; Personality; Behavioural genetics; Big Five personality traits; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Heritability; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Biology; Demography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09274115,0.001450152,0.003525547,0.003265419,0.001772297,0.002980112,0.004079701,0.001352618,0.005084898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2338686,0.0008509183,0.0007805207,0.004048072,0.003716802,0.003106533,0.004360686,0.005839084,0.001137494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008709602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002725137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004855926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005367062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8705649,0.1143154,0.002567176,0.005421236,0.00679263,0.0003386635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8445507,0.1125907,0.007534144,0.02636574,0.007971786,0.0009868727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001293812,0.0002527558,0.05116132,0.001964206,0.002072069,0.002113616,0.01557706,0.002421104,0.002499521,0.4720771,0.01906809,0.4294994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006783219,0.001254765,0.05094036,0.001881285,0.001406513,0.01096848,0.00500686,0.05442868,0.004713306,0.74006,0.1281505,0.0005108414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01465973,0.002355405,0.9715332,0.002684156,0.001045988,0.0009391811,0.0004716432,0.0002583412,0.006052506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1131197,0.001295888,0.8781058,0.001363723,0.0004370251,0.002093519,0.0002436172,0.0002367738,0.003103985],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09274115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4904679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08725853621092523,"score_gpt":0.4194742230234162,"score_spread":0.332215686812491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}