{"id":"W2160207060","doi":"10.1177/0165025409340805","title":"The discordant MZ-twin method: One step closer to the holy grail of causality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Behavioral Development","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Twin study; Holy Grail; Psychology; Causality (physics); Developmental psychology; Monozygotic twin; Population; Personality; Behavioural genetics; Big Five personality traits; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Heritability; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Biology; Demography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001473511,0.0001249496,0.0001939678,0.0000924612,0.0001165443,0.00006400737,0.00063204,0.00002833187,0.0002303555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001101515,0.00007310192,0.0001237253,0.0001126841,0.00005574619,0.00008065718,0.0001015424,0.000255189,0.00001972434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000145174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000138105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000194853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001155734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979552,0.0001861905,0.000810014,0.0001417475,0.0007013727,0.0002054475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981921,0.0003182004,0.0004402428,0.0001575288,0.0008100859,0.0000818826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004330496,0.0007438967,0.01974701,0.000001918515,0.0002381362,0.000107658,0.006594069,0.00001311993,0.002845812,0.004048697,0.002260708,0.9629659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005681134,0.0003376294,0.969134,0.00009677819,0.0000465279,0.0001619082,0.002367363,0.000002659208,0.002089811,0.0009137838,0.0241535,0.0001279067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825371,0.0001427113,0.008125214,0.006672121,0.001505306,0.0001778884,0.00001598428,0.000006803928,0.0008168764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841475,0.00000774805,0.01432778,0.0005016676,0.0002156309,0.00001024744,0.000003318667,0.000008490772,0.0007776042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.962838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.298101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08725853621092523,"score_gpt":0.4194742230234162,"score_spread":0.332215686812491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}