{"id":"W2160271672","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003","title":"Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","topic":"Electronic Health Records Systems","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":793,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Summative assessment; Computer science; Formative assessment; Usability engineering; Variety (cybernetics); Cognitive walkthrough; Information system; Heuristic evaluation; Health care; Usability goals; Knowledge management; Health informatics; Management science; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04896238,0.001450278,0.001050494,0.008911729,0.001677405,0.004956995,0.001225835,0.001474856,0.001711892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1841327,0.0006112451,0.001724485,0.004177263,0.002225378,0.003783536,0.002380936,0.00143629,0.0002348378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00372468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004672568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007660312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009268832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.913633,0.06246769,0.005906907,0.001277732,0.01594156,0.0007730554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7317827,0.2311262,0.00723077,0.004960239,0.02350658,0.001393589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002396557,0.004931147,0.04929151,0.006350131,0.001171346,0.0002449846,0.02009059,0.009954295,0.01214822,0.03367826,0.004353128,0.85539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003492262,0.0177639,0.3141049,0.008171393,0.003181417,0.002482165,0.04248451,0.3574432,0.0442492,0.1684242,0.03665612,0.00154673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4651596,0.006972107,0.5000349,0.001398955,0.000315169,0.005452255,0.0004400034,0.0007090873,0.01951795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6369506,0.001009436,0.3548788,0.0002334111,0.00006879961,0.005065632,0.0002850117,0.00008239647,0.001425998],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04896238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2589409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2322370682367249,"score_gpt":0.5971966636874222,"score_spread":0.3649595954506973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}