{"id":"W2160324138","doi":"10.1007/3-540-45545-0_108","title":"GEA: A Complete, Modular System for Generating Evaluative Arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Modular design; Argument (complex analysis); Generator (circuit theory); Focus (optics); Natural language generation; Natural language; Architecture; Programming language; Sample (material); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Power (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001782405,0.000608073,0.0007301985,0.0006658644,0.0005573945,0.0006324905,0.00238339,0.0003068049,0.000009431839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009221245,0.000554415,0.0002058177,0.0004582206,0.0001950581,0.0004653441,0.0007023042,0.0004001593,0.00004269206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000375077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004709816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005098877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951118,0.00008850789,0.0008607486,0.001843266,0.001340122,0.000755546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968807,0.000434461,0.0006692135,0.001282495,0.0005527993,0.0001803905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001654266,0.00008229294,0.0001230814,0.0005381235,0.0001002283,0.0001033647,0.003379012,0.4340066,0.004660803,0.05641939,0.0001140984,0.5004565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005830532,0.0001584822,0.00005516894,0.0007045839,0.00001448506,0.00005983653,4.637486e-7,0.9847876,0.0007457903,0.01108813,0.001215055,0.000587314],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003675969,0.0003835934,0.992767,0.0001876999,0.003061554,0.001616614,0.0000209948,0.0001938291,0.001401158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2959358,0.00001252794,0.7011924,0.0006411428,0.001427134,0.000124418,0.00002821695,0.00006697007,0.0005714044],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04631125331169834,"score_gpt":0.2818428311172609,"score_spread":0.2355315778055626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}