{"id":"W2160358302","doi":"10.5555/2484920.2484983","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Condorcet method; Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Correlated equilibrium; Approval voting; Best response; Economics; Game theory; Repeated game","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004894391,0.00005806702,0.0003335968,0.0002439868,0.0000229474,0.00002386513,0.00009021864,0.00005429009,0.004016744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007432386,0.0000566311,0.0001591165,0.000654518,0.00002544045,0.0001341877,0.00001819997,0.00004421704,0.0006773414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002336876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003166924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001312623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002778555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.00002399607,0.0004606908,0.0001728034,0.00001694978,0.0001232577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994792,0.00005405057,0.0001978732,0.0002055766,0.00002686193,0.00003639584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004799784,0.00005254794,0.781621,0.00001259408,0.0004219701,6.739924e-8,0.0002103369,0.00008282753,0.0004079862,0.2156394,0.001353788,0.0001927543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000167621,0.0000512698,0.9089792,0.000002701851,0.00005756597,5.796025e-7,0.00007499626,0.03765045,0.0005395832,0.04908565,0.00322755,0.0001627876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938512,0.00005618387,0.003782975,0.0002266695,0.0001077915,0.00007832099,0.000009139691,0.00003038907,0.05719656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961211,0.000002073999,0.0001288878,0.0000826445,0.00002792516,0.000007343334,0.000006305066,0.000004393562,0.00361929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1665537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05485546299585243,"score_gpt":0.2704340441057674,"score_spread":0.215578581109915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}