{"id":"W2160386264","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00968","title":"Establishing the validity and reliability of the Project Talent Personality Inventory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Personality; Construct validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Applied psychology; Personality Assessment Inventory; Predictive validity; Sample (material); Construct (python library); Test (biology); Criterion validity; Big Five personality traits; Validity; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001544147,0.000185043,0.0003193724,0.00009811153,0.000136542,0.00003116707,0.0006137302,0.0002395739,0.0002648487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002501193,0.000115981,0.0001185458,0.0003365136,0.0008538199,0.0001664345,0.0001399587,0.0005813442,0.00001276915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005494219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004044816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001504436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003992372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972255,0.001193066,0.0004395787,0.0005416187,0.0001818783,0.0004183516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984977,0.0001977766,0.0002053326,0.0009795175,0.00006732917,0.0000523661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005710282,0.000201613,0.8005024,0.00002966191,0.00002668022,0.000002111704,0.00827186,0.00000283235,0.00002866654,0.0003660739,0.1813235,0.009187474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009637017,0.0001145095,0.9428048,0.00002903979,0.00003371297,0.00002144694,0.004646083,0.00019569,0.00002256031,0.025623,0.02534784,0.000197624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472325,0.0005947241,0.0009527046,0.0029869,0.005820156,0.0009106452,0.000008767271,0.00002767282,0.04146586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960343,0.000110184,0.001453974,0.001432935,0.0001587443,0.0001442912,0.000003011998,0.00002187592,0.0006407007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1559757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4729567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02884897638151189,"score_gpt":0.3139049017979965,"score_spread":0.2850559254164846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}