{"id":"W2160386264","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00968","title":"Establishing the validity and reliability of the Project Talent Personality Inventory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Personality; Construct validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Applied psychology; Personality Assessment Inventory; Predictive validity; Sample (material); Construct (python library); Test (biology); Criterion validity; Big Five personality traits; Validity; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008781611,0.0002406174,0.0002838392,0.00136,0.0005841987,0.0008355794,0.0004626316,0.0002550388,0.0008173387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02059321,0.0002362793,0.000429086,0.0008165988,0.0004792623,0.0005491815,0.001403613,0.0007500316,0.000275262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004806251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009570664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002447922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003087338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969109,0.001182167,0.0003448359,0.0002243528,0.00112414,0.0002136639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905871,0.003445379,0.001479489,0.0009921298,0.002656859,0.0008391211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001141876,0.0002418668,0.9562392,0.00003857421,0.00009016206,0.00005515971,0.001616911,0.0003435496,0.0006927167,0.0007305332,0.0008259199,0.03901128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002489657,0.0003011073,0.9944232,0.00004228237,0.00003246834,0.00008512396,0.0007898335,0.001488576,0.0004276367,0.0005548623,0.001814262,0.00001586257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990807,0.0001275876,0.003101486,0.0001484682,0.00004204529,0.0003072096,0.0003974681,0.00002108314,0.00504752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920001,0.0001254977,0.006164997,0.00004797986,0.00002482468,0.000502717,0.0006732947,0.000008769973,0.0004518222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008781611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04644215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02884897638151189,"score_gpt":0.3139049017979965,"score_spread":0.2850559254164846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}