{"id":"W2160582543","doi":"10.1139/b2012-025","title":"Tiller organization within the tussock grass <i>Schizachyrium scoparium</i>: a field assessment of competition–cooperation tradeoffs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agricultural Research Service","keywords":"Tussock; Biology; Tiller (botany); Competition (biology); Agronomy; Ecology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002970874,0.00008098964,0.00009670094,0.0000120442,0.0002502123,0.00001183058,0.0001019157,0.00005602875,0.0007366905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009973395,0.00005847045,0.00002209547,0.0002105992,0.00009451459,0.0001902779,0.00006743504,0.0001043805,0.0001119582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005256161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001261258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002781924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002768147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993246,0.00008541075,0.0001989153,0.0001076911,0.0001472633,0.0001361161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995638,0.0000982094,0.0001498719,0.000132224,0.00002358198,0.00003231391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004114508,0.0001540771,0.951768,0.000006248913,0.00002376161,2.449191e-7,0.0008390572,0.001891489,0.01104968,0.03236392,0.001861279,0.00003813117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001801081,0.00005044139,0.9927086,0.000006454365,0.00002651942,0.000004415315,0.0001739646,0.004706444,0.001474553,0.0002260496,0.0003513822,0.00009107358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741594,0.00006158501,0.01037017,0.00177531,0.0003677558,0.0002247913,0.000003702096,0.00002804515,0.01300927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976805,0.00002097414,0.001162028,0.000658431,0.00004162139,0.00001463137,0.000005993645,0.000007617674,0.0004082472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0409406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8066244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007766868454990306,"score_gpt":0.2383477796971084,"score_spread":0.230580911242118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}