{"id":"W2160776656","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2010.e.51","title":"Responding to Calgary's “Gang War”: A Political Sociology of Criminological Ideas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Newspaper; Criminology; Crime control; Scarcity; Sociology; Control (management); Political process; Social control; Law; Social science; Political science; Media studies; Criminal justice; Management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003729261,0.0003931448,0.000847073,0.001737953,0.0007711388,0.00006043695,0.000914523,0.0008511175,0.000682553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01237774,0.0004108449,0.0003253495,0.0002481129,0.002765873,0.0004102297,0.0001202017,0.00130751,0.00002189368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001378807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003340179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02824708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03418562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937078,0.001503625,0.001032686,0.0004121439,0.0001751532,0.003168532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925854,0.002068571,0.0004744513,0.0003553171,0.0006678547,0.003848433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000199756,0.0001242472,0.006573958,0.0007134195,0.0001229159,0.001073087,0.1084219,0.00002475942,0.0009689491,0.8752564,0.001918095,0.00460255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001208028,0.002173843,0.1242774,0.0006680613,0.01152926,0.008493842,0.7967363,0.0000528544,0.0008470822,0.02210381,0.03078314,0.00112639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745254,0.002516133,0.003582291,0.006528385,0.00112861,0.0002185939,0.00004460718,0.0000304075,0.01142557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911759,0.0002870134,0.004056253,0.003152441,0.0008494665,0.00001972915,0.000006646211,0.00003903254,0.000413557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.158986359219812,"score_gpt":0.3856986370560652,"score_spread":0.2267122778362532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}