{"id":"W2160799349","doi":"10.1177/000494410404800307","title":"Dialogical Critical Thinking: Elements of Definitions Emerging in the Analysis of Transcripts from Pupils Aged 10 to 12 Years","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Critical thinking; Context (archaeology); Philosophy for Children; Grounded theory; Modalities; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Social science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02009943,0.0006146002,0.0005891965,0.004922651,0.005899874,0.005323846,0.001371049,0.001261021,0.001498502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06173237,0.0003871224,0.0002608205,0.004458881,0.01024644,0.004850641,0.005654064,0.002162098,0.0002613512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004012336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003739706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004597987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007783246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839196,0.01135764,0.0009850436,0.0009255279,0.001937914,0.0008742973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.919524,0.06324803,0.007264853,0.002140006,0.006612435,0.001210576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001398872,0.000005951655,0.001292092,0.00006841751,0.00000118623,0.0002512274,0.992824,0.00001324443,0.0007077178,0.002069287,0.0001404837,0.002612405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000406767,0.00002147048,0.005873486,0.0002675831,0.000003235147,0.0004459705,0.9777423,0.0001071139,0.0007812465,0.00349669,0.01123678,0.00002017235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499683,0.0008301062,0.02977224,0.004409289,0.000138348,0.0006530464,0.0005835838,0.00006959176,0.01357544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804153,0.0006330733,0.01392999,0.0003788135,0.00004543117,0.001243769,0.0003432719,0.00008312942,0.002927096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02009943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1062972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.120659319868886,"score_gpt":0.4029756917276057,"score_spread":0.2823163718587196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}