{"id":"W2160974300","doi":"10.1017/s0007087402004715","title":"Huxley and scientific agnosticism: the strange history of a failed rhetorical strategy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Epistemology; Scientific revolution; Literature; Art; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001682218,0.00009647585,0.0001768404,0.0000605841,0.002874312,0.0002864627,0.0009467489,0.00002268743,0.0006353632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002334063,0.00005492021,0.0001362004,0.0000771969,0.01727788,0.0003523231,0.00006142976,0.0003187511,0.000005051116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003630359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001841831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001650917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000219924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986197,0.00007071576,0.0003286765,0.0001795557,0.0005522448,0.0002490831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986457,0.0004858364,0.0002709765,0.0002353681,0.0002766027,0.00008555602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007603185,0.0003142073,0.000005004604,0.0000665159,0.00005510729,0.00002152397,0.06021678,0.0000468716,0.002238806,0.3200373,0.5494689,0.0674529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003317611,0.0001821907,0.0002208436,0.0001071012,0.00008178664,0.0002163798,0.001656028,0.001052077,0.0000167951,0.02252994,0.9734851,0.0001199738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2908593,0.4006544,0.0002792857,0.01103726,0.0485533,0.001618139,0.000217828,0.00007946526,0.2467011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322535,0.0003291778,0.00001315653,0.0001159101,0.0004393207,0.000005429709,2.62235e-7,0.000008657493,0.06683456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6413943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1284339182212372,"score_gpt":0.2425737012805695,"score_spread":0.1141397830593323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}