{"id":"W2160974300","doi":"10.1017/s0007087402004715","title":"Huxley and scientific agnosticism: the strange history of a failed rhetorical strategy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Epistemology; Scientific revolution; Literature; Art; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01290278,0.0004242773,0.0006854283,0.003956223,0.009568212,0.01174172,0.00105004,0.006632229,0.002910898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01792422,0.0004960291,0.0003242157,0.00213726,0.06615239,0.01565846,0.005058589,0.00979324,0.0007145055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007903839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003124973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003397521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002343742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905924,0.006471499,0.000256677,0.0007025232,0.001441294,0.0005355356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775694,0.0189189,0.0008499382,0.001077584,0.00113488,0.0004493383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009784175,0.000003710093,0.00004915068,0.00002122113,0.000002367718,0.00003423187,0.005903833,0.00004013019,0.00003554995,0.9883742,0.002745337,0.002780458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001800514,0.00001935518,0.0001944023,0.0001941139,0.000006603469,0.0001004897,0.003110389,0.0003236957,0.000321132,0.8536455,0.1420471,0.00001925932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0538258,0.05235509,0.02770587,0.3477117,0.003104707,0.00004209033,0.00006739255,0.000253798,0.5149335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402757,0.006582561,0.005443252,0.01789531,0.002803075,0.00006711558,0.00002414123,0.0001830174,0.02672599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06823725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1284339182212372,"score_gpt":0.2425737012805695,"score_spread":0.1141397830593323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}