{"id":"W2160980898","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02413.x","title":"Revisiting projected shifts in the climate envelopes of North American trees using updated general circulation models","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Climate Program Office; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"General Circulation Model; Climatology; Climate change; Precipitation; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Ocean general circulation model; Climate model; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Meteorology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002852228,0.0001217844,0.0002117054,0.00008216781,0.00006463828,0.00001043685,0.0002166871,0.00004275361,0.00003784785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002962105,0.00008340752,0.0000342999,0.0006175172,0.0001399492,0.0001332371,0.00002226131,0.00005907168,0.000007945635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001150105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002519645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02845957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02671131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987238,0.0003770538,0.0002463751,0.0002180462,0.00008505471,0.0003496734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999559,0.00004942782,0.0001843202,0.0001432597,0.00003272864,0.00003124341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009452313,0.000008483717,0.9697666,0.000008626651,0.000008035728,0.000006571711,0.0005410265,0.0001097027,0.00002236423,0.00008953061,9.066588e-7,0.02934364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011505,0.00007500052,0.9822243,0.00001235379,0.00001081728,0.00001078633,0.0001038421,0.01723296,0.000004324037,0.0001102174,0.00001696313,0.00009724101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985662,0.0002192125,0.00004184568,0.00003767993,0.00006273301,0.0002157247,0.0003678366,0.0000312528,0.0004575328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997886,0.00009826718,0.001544048,0.0001104785,0.00008349367,0.000002283352,0.0002729046,0.000002299687,1.986685e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0292464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1232504807221108,"score_gpt":0.2917279228015166,"score_spread":0.1684774420794058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}