{"id":"W2161033934","doi":"10.1364/ol.36.000526","title":"Dynamic phase evaluation in sparse-sampled temporal speckle pattern sequence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optics Letters","topic":"Optical measurement and interference techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Speckle pattern; Phase retrieval; Computer science; Electronic speckle pattern interferometry; Speckle noise; Interferometry; Speckle imaging; Optics; Sampling (signal processing); Wavelet; Artificial intelligence; Fourier transform; Phase (matter); Computer vision; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004002374,0.0002460843,0.000214623,0.0005615751,0.0001338032,0.0004452901,0.0002139485,0.0002676821,0.0008400872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001627526,0.0001250837,0.000114123,0.0004120077,0.0002790768,0.00081084,0.0003010793,0.0001872906,0.0001873833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002234404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002059764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004003457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000643256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999744,0.00005261782,0.00001117345,0.00003316438,0.000142696,0.00001638818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999488,0.0001798346,0.00007692194,0.0000476267,0.0001836808,0.00002387576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005332947,0.00009152273,0.002461714,0.0001827241,0.00002983321,0.0002555271,0.0001999574,0.07492495,0.5232549,0.01958897,0.0007631722,0.3777134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001938529,0.0001575814,0.001693716,0.000011072,0.00001093964,0.0003355423,0.00003904291,0.8917823,0.1012878,0.003360772,0.001281055,0.00002082527],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1743298,0.0002008299,0.8233145,0.00007125763,0.0000300813,0.00002995117,0.00004511976,0.0002010841,0.001777378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6493584,0.0003286162,0.3484332,0.00003962775,0.00003143405,0.00003984854,0.0001322197,0.00004786178,0.001588804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008400872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002810419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1522351449907212,"score_gpt":0.332039363264695,"score_spread":0.1798042182739737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}