{"id":"W2161077193","doi":"10.1002/jcc.10385","title":"Time‐reversible always stable predictor–corrector method for molecular dynamics of polarizable molecules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Polarizability; Molecular dynamics; Relaxation (psychology); Predictor–corrector method; Field (mathematics); Energy (signal processing); Dynamics (music); Molecule; Order (exchange); Statistical physics; Force field (fiction); Computational chemistry; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Chemistry; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002049355,0.0001254806,0.0002961289,0.00002386735,0.00006161749,0.00001405927,0.0001299479,0.00004211806,0.0003215445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005245315,0.0001187373,0.0002129698,0.0001073966,0.00004486989,0.00007279118,0.00001982347,0.0001418104,0.000001095021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008483248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002577696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006886962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.806566e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990838,0.0000223333,0.0003779855,0.0001109517,0.000239054,0.0001658876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998867,0.0002525913,0.0003822224,0.00006702782,0.0003549196,0.00007619077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002572671,0.0007626791,0.003154074,0.0002957781,0.001376854,0.000006182795,0.000187974,0.2135951,0.7553505,0.01975205,0.004751712,0.0005098503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009883022,0.00007331443,0.00003444456,0.00005392908,0.0001123833,0.0000121281,0.0001756896,0.0248922,0.8231162,0.1491174,0.001268101,0.0001559008],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3496798,0.0002612349,0.6430672,0.0000979987,0.00008552222,0.00008381508,0.0002291113,0.000006929876,0.006488342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398548,0.000001680568,0.1594403,0.00002807714,0.0001498553,0.000004791743,0.0001072799,0.00002158956,0.0003916397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.490175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4841967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005433303964592956,"score_gpt":0.2543442661237289,"score_spread":0.2489109621591359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}