{"id":"W2161119505","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9469.2009.00643.x","title":"Local Power Analyses of Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Copulas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Mathematics; Copula (linguistics); Estimator; Statistics; Econometrics; Moment (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004846526,0.0001183858,0.000655316,0.0002559388,0.0000474853,0.00001541718,0.0001877737,0.00007344617,0.00005938619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004299193,0.0001213483,0.0001679612,0.000202172,0.00009239922,0.0001259151,0.00001041121,0.0001266852,0.000003110416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005787219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005675069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005595797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008493037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983169,0.00001016728,0.001280408,0.0001268407,0.00007416648,0.0001915524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980337,0.0001314701,0.001286247,0.0001498423,0.0003085788,0.00009018363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001271511,0.001179999,0.2402803,0.0004337371,0.0004145789,0.00005110682,0.002479451,0.009399044,0.000965905,0.6831102,0.008658379,0.05175584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003063077,0.004337007,0.3160601,0.0004684031,0.0001577698,0.00003632317,0.000390186,0.02460818,0.002379978,0.6461686,0.001814018,0.0005162879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2071625,0.001832138,0.7889066,0.00006780594,0.0002841544,0.00009270143,0.001255556,0.000002562296,0.0003959856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960377,0.0001666412,0.03931271,0.00002629801,0.00004905886,4.624238e-7,0.000007900934,0.00001069542,0.00004927477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7532145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4948439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1131123858039823,"score_gpt":0.3418397559830424,"score_spread":0.2287273701790602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}