{"id":"W2161131303","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.087","title":"Poster 56: Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Parkwood Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; CINAHL; Randomized controlled trial; PsycINFO; Psychological intervention; Physical therapy; Cognitive behavioral therapy; MEDLINE; Rehabilitation; Cognitive restructuring; Spinal cord injury; Clinical psychology; Systematic review; Cognitive therapy; Data extraction; Cognition; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01224439,0.001491957,0.01113188,0.006269626,0.0007170133,0.002372579,0.001682498,0.002328825,0.006095961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04184793,0.001096696,0.01137902,0.005781576,0.0009872325,0.002069102,0.001963641,0.001647262,0.0003550485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004114921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009040058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03156044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923978,0.003091177,0.002434846,0.0005170523,0.001305572,0.0002535327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804725,0.01338882,0.004017007,0.0003023036,0.001444811,0.0003746114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001875569,0.00005496047,0.001232586,0.9093708,0.05566938,0.0001035387,0.0001701003,0.0001182538,0.0003122534,0.0001124901,0.001613293,0.02936668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005979086,0.0009654947,0.01048741,0.4579898,0.5146667,0.0003721486,0.00032426,0.0001764273,0.0004205767,0.0003417563,0.008204263,0.00007212471],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003904122,0.9930546,0.0002029605,0.0004494605,0.0003317545,0.001264585,0.0004134226,0.00001983884,0.0003593771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07190361,0.922924,0.001477331,0.00114133,0.000271129,0.001586226,0.000339915,0.00001396426,0.0003424705],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06475526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06333472142580258,"score_gpt":0.4791846190860283,"score_spread":0.4158498976602257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}