{"id":"W2161167422","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2008.01.014","title":"Assessing Written Evidence of Critical Thinking Using an Analytic Rubric","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Grading (engineering); Critical thinking; Depiction; Computer science; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001031642,0.00007149952,0.0001758548,0.000242139,0.0005694128,0.0001290135,0.0001384283,0.00007520791,0.000162196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006977273,0.00007033478,0.00006287615,0.0003109142,0.0003300243,0.001418148,0.00001072609,0.000172123,0.000001214028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001437029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007122918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006349689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998507,0.0002470754,0.0004686285,0.0001094387,0.0005251478,0.0001426909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983009,0.0002432485,0.0002180788,0.00007619125,0.0009447947,0.00021678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009606214,0.1263807,0.3557605,0.001616473,0.00008929519,0.0001278058,0.2715518,0.00001075862,0.0337062,0.07946664,0.003067483,0.1281263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001022886,0.0005770226,0.667933,0.004737439,0.000820943,0.001383943,0.2873855,0.00007358391,0.002025608,0.02815112,0.005180925,0.0007079646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938245,0.0008284051,0.000713868,0.00347212,0.0008834854,0.00009827053,4.013067e-7,0.000009770371,0.0001691688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655205,0.0004230503,0.03319678,0.0003064705,0.00049236,0.000006796085,0.00000102937,0.000005837427,0.00004717684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3121725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1633363127577998,"score_gpt":0.4650558574569147,"score_spread":0.3017195446991149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}