{"id":"W2161194188","doi":"10.1177/0261927x02021003003","title":"Understanding Irony","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Irony; Comprehension; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Cued speech; Literal (mathematical logic); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003130054,0.0001037946,0.0002520076,0.0001556512,0.0001172788,0.00002300431,0.0001104515,0.0001766538,0.004251629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002076695,0.00008700134,0.0001197439,0.0001072489,0.0001128152,0.00008791687,0.00001178182,0.0002994655,0.00008115637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002832497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004177688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001009247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008036704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990184,0.0001798992,0.0003083919,0.0001335944,0.0001339012,0.0002258394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995021,0.00006442918,0.0002422626,0.00008916776,0.00003832781,0.00006368691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006503595,0.001211468,0.00394613,0.00005344869,0.001009476,0.004428623,0.5122216,2.482883e-7,0.009068396,0.06671276,0.2240468,0.1766507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02749649,0.004314469,0.1060625,0.0001307903,0.001275163,0.01174449,0.6947585,0.00002560399,0.0002590668,0.06980435,0.08217609,0.001952472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.84758,0.005402277,0.003597494,0.002580461,0.001680469,0.00007428849,0.000006998679,0.00002476009,0.1390532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947134,0.0001158063,0.00009042084,0.002513123,0.001079472,0.000001414568,0.000001628506,0.00001488404,0.001469915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1825369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1115523891043053,"score_gpt":0.3649664392931216,"score_spread":0.2534140501888164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}