{"id":"W2161252007","doi":"","title":"\"WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?\": THE USE OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY DURING ENGAGEMENT WITH READING NARRATIVE AND INFORMATIONAL GENRES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Reading comprehension; Narrative; Comprehension; Reading (process); Humanities; Psychology; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00590158,0.0005470124,0.0005374725,0.00129658,0.004268828,0.003637315,0.001362868,0.001472347,0.001976089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145643,0.0004104005,0.0004611199,0.0007908873,0.007310152,0.003404638,0.003718512,0.001833164,0.0003934244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001934342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001994239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002620997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005355863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992094,0.005764612,0.0002318813,0.000511964,0.000764747,0.0006327654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887288,0.00828287,0.001112558,0.0004586212,0.0007222684,0.0006949768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001875728,0.0000434287,0.004313566,0.00007093927,0.000003681143,0.00129417,0.9862987,0.00003160506,0.001017405,0.001085476,0.0001873948,0.005634886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000501139,0.0001116131,0.004270131,0.0001659981,0.000009874164,0.002016321,0.9752714,0.0001594027,0.001721209,0.0007379729,0.01550619,0.00002482571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870452,0.000337223,0.004055293,0.001089521,0.00002335845,0.00006895036,0.00003831716,0.00002488238,0.007317228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993264,0.0002826241,0.001991648,0.0001990978,0.00001044702,0.00008003522,0.00002318622,0.00002012829,0.004128941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00590158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0312109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1402244835784472,"score_gpt":0.3467225620731954,"score_spread":0.2064980784947482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}