{"id":"W2161252007","doi":"","title":"\"WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?\": THE USE OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY DURING ENGAGEMENT WITH READING NARRATIVE AND INFORMATIONAL GENRES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Reading comprehension; Narrative; Comprehension; Reading (process); Humanities; Psychology; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001943125,0.000139471,0.0001973102,0.0005532489,0.0006970007,0.000113115,0.0001648194,0.00006953512,0.0001805942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000865095,0.0001137674,0.00004155206,0.0003501282,0.0002062804,0.0007841766,0.000005487737,0.0005369976,0.000001634908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007822675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003687802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01392962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02947844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981812,0.0008162535,0.0004565175,0.0001395638,0.00009110986,0.0003153583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974855,0.000324604,0.0007373802,0.0001794372,0.0009581085,0.000314996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005212806,0.00003157514,0.01437399,0.0000417113,0.0002249558,0.00001818956,0.9626471,0.0009241545,0.0001173591,0.01099005,0.001884403,0.00869442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003615274,0.0002363427,0.499358,0.0003771117,0.00009123183,0.00199744,0.4841253,0.00003585807,0.0001461861,0.0005766891,0.01249226,0.0002019932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950042,0.0003400623,0.0004932201,0.001743233,0.001505964,0.0001822553,0.000008298734,0.000004270479,0.0007184665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952663,0.00002905461,0.00212622,0.0003578963,0.0002707301,0.00001878565,0.0000252545,0.00001685247,0.001888922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.484984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1402244835784472,"score_gpt":0.3467225620731954,"score_spread":0.2064980784947482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}