{"id":"W2161252226","doi":"10.1139/f07-134","title":"Comparison of in situ, ex situ, and backscatter model estimates of Pacific hake (<i>Merluccius productus</i>) target strength","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Underwater Acoustics Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Merluccius; Hake; Target strength; In situ; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Oceanography; Backscatter (email); Fishery; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Geology; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000397678,0.0004405326,0.0002333004,0.0003852397,0.0001234937,0.0003189946,0.0002699817,0.0001905177,0.0004016192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007810493,0.0003256491,0.0002194004,0.0002357275,0.000109819,0.0004393218,0.0002222612,0.0001530274,0.0001589598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000219893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001707801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006279518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01572747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998534,0.00003711957,0.00000905061,0.00005047279,0.00003341282,0.00001663573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994769,0.0001907483,0.00006393357,0.00004774108,0.0001970177,0.00002360118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001097627,0.0003067327,0.6673371,0.0002225549,0.0003361777,0.0002957712,0.0007224436,0.04897588,0.2161592,0.0002771458,0.0007380927,0.06353137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004557814,0.0004162875,0.7912357,0.00001812624,0.0001672396,0.0004201473,0.0005192643,0.1585451,0.04775361,0.0001435097,0.0006840667,0.00005126688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940831,0.00003149246,0.004880146,0.000009577444,0.000003408338,0.000003585949,0.0001047211,0.00004251407,0.00084133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962662,0.00003711501,0.003077672,0.000008664839,0.000001617884,0.000007151394,0.0002552811,0.00001677906,0.0003294767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006279518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01248598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03496024677965309,"score_gpt":0.2676844583104768,"score_spread":0.2327242115308237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}