{"id":"W2161390130","doi":"","title":"A framework for system level verification : the SystemC Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"SystemC; Computer science; Electronic system-level design and verification; Intelligent verification; High-level verification; Functional verification; System on a chip; Formal verification; Transaction-level modeling; Programming language; Runtime verification; Random testing; Computer architecture; Embedded system; Software; Test case; Software system; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002837545,0.0003821583,0.0004530683,0.001012083,0.002296734,0.0006459884,0.003247149,0.0006667341,0.000004182169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004462832,0.0003574674,0.0003212065,0.001949694,0.0001902066,0.0007726158,0.0002318619,0.001485257,0.00005769661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002142315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001097457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002690105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002747045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948481,0.001534507,0.0005919815,0.001151736,0.001015525,0.0008581034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948151,0.00106962,0.0006009843,0.002423509,0.000835183,0.0002556344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002170219,0.00005544686,0.0001592364,0.0008812114,0.0001161802,0.0008344427,0.001226157,0.00003045073,0.0004870538,0.99119,0.0004492717,0.004353526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005046931,0.00373681,0.03878354,0.006341805,0.001311711,0.01342032,0.1492125,0.2094201,0.1683683,0.01597549,0.3809107,0.007471715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08426893,0.0006128888,0.8165167,0.0006900461,0.007105557,0.004985773,0.00007001356,0.0008171377,0.08493298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240989,0.00004016136,0.04844701,0.000007941227,0.001112523,0.0001174749,0.00005922988,0.00006884793,0.02604789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08966554500480338,"score_gpt":0.3481046273621954,"score_spread":0.258439082357392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}