{"id":"W2161390130","doi":"","title":"A framework for system level verification : the SystemC Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"SystemC; Computer science; Electronic system-level design and verification; Intelligent verification; High-level verification; Functional verification; System on a chip; Formal verification; Transaction-level modeling; Programming language; Runtime verification; Random testing; Computer architecture; Embedded system; Software; Test case; Software system; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008746968,0.002096515,0.001612138,0.003486312,0.001911131,0.006351789,0.004143362,0.004598816,0.006555197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01453375,0.001343991,0.003285126,0.002705547,0.009606135,0.006043634,0.003700325,0.006702606,0.002152583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003538039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00465547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01123524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005250041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907368,0.004425004,0.0005699442,0.0009029499,0.002668138,0.0006972125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918329,0.005200939,0.0004822256,0.001534137,0.000739046,0.000210632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001494604,0.00001879648,0.0001216779,0.0001444954,0.0000171486,0.000228585,0.0001776699,0.0124291,0.0006552649,0.9703586,0.001348586,0.01448528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007162622,0.00008491478,0.0001288162,0.0004250127,0.00005962537,0.0005005906,0.0001423148,0.1559436,0.0029232,0.7333362,0.1063309,0.00005334472],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009589078,0.00108782,0.9858142,0.0008798405,0.0000866824,0.0002000788,0.0000849875,0.0005210737,0.01036654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07969944,0.001889203,0.9116119,0.0005612446,0.0002455699,0.001078257,0.0002605906,0.0003286776,0.00432516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01123524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04625893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08966554500480338,"score_gpt":0.3481046273621954,"score_spread":0.258439082357392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}