{"id":"W2161433272","doi":"10.1016/s1473-3099(06)70578-3","title":"Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Lancet Infectious Diseases","topic":"Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":795,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"World Bank Group; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Fluorescence microscope; Microscopy; Optical microscope; Sputum; Tuberculosis; Fluorescence; Medicine; Pathology; Materials science; Optics; Scanning electron microscope; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06667537641272565,"score_gpt":0.4086985001377458,"score_spread":0.3420231237250201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}