{"id":"W2161576547","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00024.x","title":"The Optimal Length of an Agricultural Carbon Contract","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; BIOCAP Canada","keywords":"Contract farming; Offset (computer science); Marginal value; Economics; Marginal cost; Carbon fibers; Welfare; Agriculture; Microeconomics; Carbon offset; Social cost; Social discount rate; Value (mathematics); Natural resource economics; Social contract; Agricultural economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Greenhouse gas; Mathematics; Ecology; Market economy; Production (economics); Computer science; Biology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004732986,0.0002990119,0.0004357984,0.0001069293,0.0003159703,0.0001628619,0.0009702821,0.0001141688,0.0009237262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005467351,0.0001949913,0.0002480527,0.0001348182,0.0003230329,0.0009454006,0.00004585709,0.0002919593,0.0001091255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001750895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001783257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09028523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9132262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978824,0.00005512905,0.0009041352,0.0002759327,0.00002845501,0.0008539692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974495,0.00007622686,0.0007831415,0.0002838215,0.0000565449,0.001350832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004305822,0.0002381463,0.06823754,0.00006835281,0.001312228,0.0001924459,0.01631537,0.6493805,0.001949822,0.05929299,0.08064554,0.1219365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001548277,0.0009906306,0.711003,0.00004345702,0.0001780035,0.000824435,0.002179707,0.003136472,0.0005086607,0.0003501737,0.2782136,0.00102361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980785,0.0001618894,1.896516e-7,0.004212765,0.000645617,0.0002222147,0.00004366738,0.000006402093,0.01392232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959826,0.00006810146,0.0001905752,0.0002119639,0.0009134758,0.000005767492,0.00001804617,0.00001703077,0.002592456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.822941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009708383482554,"score_gpt":0.1611186469195859,"score_spread":0.1514102634370319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}