{"id":"W2161770374","doi":"10.1109/lsp.2005.860544","title":"A novel radius-adjusted approach for blind adaptive equalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Signal Processing Letters","topic":"Blind Source Separation Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrature amplitude modulation; QAM; Algorithm; Blind equalization; Adaptive equalizer; Weighting; Constellation diagram; Mean squared error; Equalization (audio); Constellation; Computer science; Mathematics; Convergence (economics); RADIUS; Control theory (sociology); Bit error rate; Statistics; Decoding methods; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004782817,0.0007082661,0.000625527,0.0007077078,0.0004019695,0.0007602662,0.001166338,0.0008768414,0.001893348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001761444,0.0003117551,0.0005479439,0.0006592752,0.000475008,0.001342039,0.0009026608,0.0007954157,0.001271036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004485864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005225106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000745567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009388976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993321,0.0001549603,0.0000449125,0.0001319581,0.0002981947,0.0000378395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995372,0.0001314512,0.00003858372,0.00009607935,0.0001750938,0.00002159977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003069893,0.00005745556,0.0003645126,0.0001925571,0.0001127067,0.0001270844,0.0001309505,0.126423,0.1360431,0.08948036,0.004776516,0.6419848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002609117,0.00008428736,0.0002168976,0.00001298945,0.00002581941,0.0003359049,0.00001041282,0.9404353,0.02960313,0.01321359,0.01597897,0.00005667497],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008835827,0.0001640472,0.9981073,0.00002235681,0.0000284928,0.00001039393,0.000008142813,0.000198264,0.0005775345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0518169,0.0003314218,0.9446057,0.00008829497,0.00007329731,0.00007440544,0.00006258293,0.00009496746,0.002852474],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001893348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006333888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06706403537024434,"score_gpt":0.289431842851911,"score_spread":0.2223678074816666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}