{"id":"W2161797617","doi":"10.1142/s1793545810000976","title":"COMPARISON OF OPTICAL POLARIMETRY AND DIFFUSION TENSOR MR IMAGING FOR ASSESSING MYOCARDIAL ANISOTROPY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences","topic":"Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anisotropy; Birefringence; Polarimetry; Diffusion MRI; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Materials science; Fractional anisotropy; Polarization (electrochemistry); Optics; Magnetic resonance imaging; Physics; Chemistry; Medicine; Scattering; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410245,0.0001465159,0.0007591963,0.0003614609,0.0002636148,0.00009621774,0.0001461937,0.00007641823,0.000008073695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001778754,0.00009824226,0.00008828638,0.000744756,0.001431337,0.0003308608,0.00005892573,0.0008052688,2.604972e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005521038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006283389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001063654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.221614e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977745,0.00004067854,0.0009806383,0.00022162,0.0005830373,0.0003995154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974599,0.000536751,0.0005322156,0.0001057663,0.001081017,0.0002843762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002342809,0.0005393638,0.4874046,0.0001607013,0.0000245968,0.000007516785,0.0001732143,4.155111e-7,0.412617,0.06528676,0.000385843,0.03316569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003301101,0.01029149,0.7196923,0.00118948,0.0001098606,0.0007863105,0.002813927,0.01247363,0.2418723,0.006031064,0.001018186,0.000420394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9207069,0.0002362959,0.06622424,0.01112442,0.0003152016,0.0002350108,0.000002832593,0.00001966522,0.00113538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5928456,0.00001297299,0.4065285,0.0004447055,0.0001567682,6.059708e-7,5.353575e-7,0.00000624624,0.000003975619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3403043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5273821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03972789867302591,"score_gpt":0.4612493637666771,"score_spread":0.4215214650936512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}