{"id":"W2161857414","doi":"10.1029/2008eo110001","title":"Forest Disturbance and North American Carbon Flux","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eos","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Carbon sink; Disturbance (geology); Environmental science; Carbon sequestration; Carbon flux; Carbon cycle; Forest inventory; Carbon fibers; Atmospheric carbon cycle; Sink (geography); Climate change; Physical geography; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Carbon dioxide; Oceanography; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002247939,0.0001327879,0.0001228286,0.0008369975,0.0003443358,0.0008076764,0.0001342552,0.0001868903,0.003380268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007743447,0.00005195881,0.0001519588,0.001796725,0.0003111648,0.0005331518,0.0002943602,0.0002896379,0.0001651021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009291875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004180282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08253327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1065988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999038,0.00002165803,0.000005579785,0.00002093335,0.00002770818,0.00002038441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996178,0.00008191924,0.0001413554,0.00001726791,0.00009753549,0.00004416882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001947982,0.00007043488,0.9029438,0.0001945105,0.000138345,0.0002614409,0.0006780339,0.003412659,0.001103021,0.01700902,0.01192525,0.06206877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005419884,0.00001084188,0.9728791,0.00004960125,0.00002810771,0.0001544459,0.0005685171,0.001664853,0.0002103847,0.004567573,0.01985301,0.000008196778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.906767,0.01247915,0.001279636,0.00494881,0.0001491189,0.00001363931,0.003822679,0.00008585783,0.07045409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907865,0.005295752,0.0003720645,0.0002461101,0.00007110267,0.000008033314,0.0009346434,0.00001188987,0.002273991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1641058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005182242321154898,"score_gpt":0.168727021932805,"score_spread":0.1635447796116501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}