{"id":"W2161857414","doi":"10.1029/2008eo110001","title":"Forest Disturbance and North American Carbon Flux","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eos","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Carbon sink; Disturbance (geology); Environmental science; Carbon sequestration; Carbon flux; Carbon cycle; Forest inventory; Carbon fibers; Atmospheric carbon cycle; Sink (geography); Climate change; Physical geography; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Carbon dioxide; Oceanography; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00001585567,0.00009376484,0.00008900302,0.00000111679,0.00009249309,0.000003907599,0.0000853606,0.00001377333,0.0000677995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003664799,0.00008378155,0.00001748458,0.00009841863,0.0005946983,0.00005388541,0.000109469,0.00006407836,0.00005616081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007243602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001524427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009811275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000630265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994093,0.000008906496,0.00007499056,0.0001969378,0.0001339968,0.0001759052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997361,0.000008772293,0.00002523902,0.0001418625,4.406535e-7,0.00008761272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003808594,0.00001955903,0.9877877,7.351692e-7,0.000002194,0.00001406297,0.0001758252,0.003815288,0.00006463561,0.000002564479,0.0001758501,0.007937728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005611702,0.00004693137,0.9900041,7.229352e-7,0.000003327172,0.00001938663,0.00003640217,0.005985861,0.00001407235,0.00001152712,0.003712091,0.0001094607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931759,0.00002911837,0.0003171111,0.00004693476,0.00002783015,0.00006969368,8.70768e-7,0.00002537234,0.006307138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944018,0.00009624626,0.002900588,0.0001657956,0.00002125145,0.000007774785,0.000002781341,0.00001124029,0.002392575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007828267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3416512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005182242321154898,"score_gpt":0.168727021932805,"score_spread":0.1635447796116501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}