{"id":"W2161875494","doi":"10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01226.x","title":"A numerical comparison with the Ceplecha analytical meteoroid orbit determination method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meteoritics and Planetary Science","topic":"Astro and Planetary Science","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"U.S. Naval Observatory; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Ephemeris; Meteoroid; Orbit determination; Orbit (dynamics); Numerical integration; Longitude; Physics; Position (finance); Geodesy; Celestial mechanics; Geology; Astronomy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Aerospace engineering; Engineering; Latitude","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075534,0.0003487618,0.0003985395,0.0008073994,0.0008177855,0.001135401,0.001106181,0.0005197132,0.006222914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005392672,0.0001379798,0.000202891,0.0008295375,0.0004648292,0.0009402682,0.0007506275,0.0006191995,0.001355682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009061841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001391669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01356503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007764081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.0001349776,0.00003280387,0.00004937117,0.0002384229,0.00004724289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973534,0.0008048398,0.0001440246,0.0005948807,0.001019746,0.00008308345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000932939,0.0002815397,0.009210538,0.0003355699,0.00009270857,0.000308845,0.0005697717,0.4924242,0.01573082,0.1119958,0.02052976,0.3475875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005117106,0.00004282709,0.001111789,0.00002238233,0.00001105499,0.00008749685,0.00007335756,0.9837114,0.0038951,0.00294309,0.008031582,0.00001869987],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2495322,0.001661387,0.6125321,0.001405125,0.000927245,0.0002276575,0.001107351,0.004308435,0.1282986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.748185,0.0003738399,0.2432575,0.0001708894,0.00008246603,0.0001259994,0.0005420412,0.000496433,0.006765784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01356503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02697217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02454784522833686,"score_gpt":0.2639375424243808,"score_spread":0.2393896971960439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}