{"id":"W2161875494","doi":"10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01226.x","title":"A numerical comparison with the Ceplecha analytical meteoroid orbit determination method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meteoritics and Planetary Science","topic":"Astro and Planetary Science","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"U.S. Naval Observatory; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Ephemeris; Meteoroid; Orbit determination; Orbit (dynamics); Numerical integration; Longitude; Physics; Position (finance); Geodesy; Celestial mechanics; Geology; Astronomy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Aerospace engineering; Engineering; Latitude","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000853676,0.0001742724,0.0002119448,0.00008539509,0.0004862798,0.0001161997,0.000465405,0.00002425371,0.0003642018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001161104,0.0001055651,0.00002883555,0.0005142668,0.0006014071,0.0003304887,0.00004875025,0.0002303779,0.0000259632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006626477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008592709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007378825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001861241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984534,0.00008700298,0.0001894283,0.0004113928,0.0004354996,0.0004232561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.00025834,0.00007841677,0.000261709,0.0000622451,0.0002138962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001270843,0.000201216,0.7869235,0.00002165686,0.00007289721,0.00004414286,0.003815888,0.0007837086,0.001463005,0.04398763,0.0004719624,0.1620873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004313423,0.0008406504,0.3659433,0.00001902982,0.0001561487,0.00008451036,0.001469458,0.6222503,0.002348449,0.001633072,0.004242055,0.0005817291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435649,0.0001498535,0.4277094,0.0003654016,0.0002459333,0.0003684658,0.0001098636,0.00004831465,0.02743782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944719,0.000001312788,0.05498338,0.0001088263,0.0000654116,0.000003591549,0.00002883615,0.000004542027,0.00008511549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6214666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4304819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02454784522833686,"score_gpt":0.2639375424243808,"score_spread":0.2393896971960439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}