{"id":"W2161877893","doi":"10.2307/3316013","title":"A nonparametric test of conditional autoregressive heteroscedasticity for threshold autoregressive models","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Autoregressive model; Nonparametric statistics; Econometrics; STAR model; SETAR; Mathematics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Statistics; Series (stratigraphy); Conditional variance; Autoregressive integrated moving average; Time series","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004747186,0.0001586806,0.0005946718,0.000601841,0.0001476652,0.00005584508,0.0002705784,0.0001188571,0.0001452082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00211928,0.0001727294,0.0001575464,0.0001877723,0.00017236,0.0002354992,0.00001024079,0.0002189076,0.000008699692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000223218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006336134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001358501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981561,0.000009343827,0.001208019,0.0001934995,0.00008510683,0.000347917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970752,0.00047264,0.001293345,0.0001698157,0.0006163372,0.0003726784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009257047,0.000143379,0.1913943,0.0001151923,0.0001364684,0.0001563698,0.001206776,0.0439646,0.00001762428,0.7486547,0.01227579,0.001842186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003718,0.0004373981,0.03355624,0.00008973273,0.00003294711,0.0000535222,0.00005855104,0.4174413,0.00003872827,0.5436643,0.003366803,0.0002567093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09868941,0.001180539,0.8855499,0.0001146053,0.0005007023,0.0001914646,0.01289784,0.000003393086,0.0008721448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970374,0.0000604493,0.02909572,0.0000845797,0.000158542,0.000005216645,0.0000587998,0.00002213907,0.0001405435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8716846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7043702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05860447905047821,"score_gpt":0.2438279507574904,"score_spread":0.1852234717070122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}