{"id":"W2161889610","doi":"10.1109/jlt.2010.2043055","title":"A Unified FDTD Lattice Truncation Method for Dispersive Media Based on Periodic Boundary Conditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Lightwave Technology","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Truncation (statistics); Perfectly matched layer; Boundary value problem; Periodic boundary conditions; Mathematical analysis; Finite difference method; Mathematics; Optics; Lattice (music); Boundary (topology); Refractive index; Physics; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005510219,0.0004913252,0.0007009161,0.0005471379,0.0005178341,0.0007692152,0.001224094,0.0008977567,0.002435417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009633757,0.0003112146,0.0007146428,0.000477304,0.000582082,0.0007882835,0.0006914535,0.0009628416,0.00134178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005124354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001140308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001394124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001679178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996979,0.00006384369,0.00001983859,0.0000173487,0.0001835118,0.00001757286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997205,0.0000945073,0.00002021229,0.00004657821,0.00009852202,0.00001959209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009528802,0.0001173759,0.0005678429,0.0005216055,0.00004428373,0.0004295461,0.0003620655,0.4544939,0.07687992,0.2976172,0.006611705,0.1622594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001604021,0.00001829683,0.00004664636,0.00002898969,0.000005468169,0.0001089838,0.00001696382,0.9794059,0.004349827,0.007481037,0.008504985,0.00001689703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001117098,0.00006999719,0.996996,0.00003348293,0.00004285753,0.00002496791,0.00002981922,0.00008898979,0.00159676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03716877,0.0003521591,0.9581388,0.00006589575,0.00003686718,0.0002210774,0.000155792,0.0001133749,0.003747285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002435417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008147299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01026913951330804,"score_gpt":0.2970863030996156,"score_spread":0.2868171635863075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}